Edited By
David Kim

A mysterious trader made a staggering $200 million shorting Bitcoin and Ethereum just 30 minutes before President Trump announced 100% tariffs on China on October 10. This sudden move caused crypto markets to plunge, wiping out $400 billion in value and igniting concerns over possible insider trading.
The announcement sent liquidation levels soaring, with $19 billion erased as Bitcoin dropped 8.5%, Ethereum 12.8%, and Dogecoin saw a massive 26% decline. Commenting on the situation, a CoinDesk analyst noted that "the timing and scale of the positions opened immediately prior to the market-wide liquidation does raise suspicion of information asymmetry." This scenario brings to light the possibility of insider trading.
This isnโt the first time such circumstances have arisen. In April, after Trumpโs surprise tariff announcement dubbed "Liberation Day," markets similarly crashed, only to recover after he paused tariffs. Senator Elizabeth Warren previously urged the SEC to investigate those profits and insider knowledge from that incident.
Trump's recent activities have elicited distrust. Senator Adam Schiff pointedly remarked, "These constant gyrations in policy provide dangerous opportunities for insider trading. Who in the administration knew about this in advance?"
The fallout from Trump's tariffs affected more than just crypto. The US stock market also took a hit, with the Dow dropping nearly 900 points and the S&P 500 registering its worst day since April. Meanwhile, the IMF has sounded alarms regarding market valuations, comparing them to highs before the dot-com bubble.
"The managing director warned that a sharp correction could drag down world growth."
Amidst the chaos, the crypto community is spiraling. Traders lament the lack of regulation, with one comment reading, "No regulation, this is the price you pay for no regulation. Free range insider trading. Period." Another popular sentiment suggests that someone likely had prior knowledge of the announcement, with comments like, "Looks like it's Barron Trump or some other Trump family member."
โฐ An anonymous trader opened large short positions 30 minutes before Trump's tariff tweet.
๐ Crypto markets saw a $400 billion loss in a single day.
๐ฐ The trader reportedly made $200 million from the market crash.
๐จ Senator Schiff warns of ongoing insider trading risks due to unpredictable policy swings.
Trump's social media presence has transformed his announcements into powerful market movers. He often tweets about tariffs, and with each declaration, concerns resurface about who may have advance knowledge. The implications are significant: regular investors face liquidations while others walk away with immense profits.
The question looms large: how many more instances like this remain hidden? Elizabeth Warrenโs call for SEC investigation back in April seems to have lost momentum as similar patterns emerge once again in October. Is this just the beginning of a potential crisis in market integrity?
With the recent stir in crypto markets, thereโs a strong likelihood of increased scrutiny from government bodies like the SEC. Experts estimate around a 70% chance that the SEC will escalate investigations into potential insider trading linked to Trump's tariff announcements. Traders will likely tighten their belts as volatility becomes a standard feature. Additionally, while the crypto community cries for regulation, it might take time for any new measures to be implemented. The whispers of another market dip could echo through discussions around an upcoming tariff update, leading to further declines, especially as more traders enter short positions in anticipation.
This current situation is reminiscent of the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, where a sudden and unexpected policy shift caught many off guard, leading to massive losses for regular investors. Just as the devaluation of the Thai baht sent shockwaves through global markets, Trumpโs abrupt tariff announcement jolted crypto values overnight, showcasing how a single tweet can wield immense power. In both cases, large players capitalized on these shifts while the smaller players suffered. Drawing parallels between market reactions then and now underlines the delicate balance of information and power dynamics, illustrating that the invisible hand behind the scenes often writes the script in favor of the few, leaving the many to deal with the fallout.