Home
/
Crypto assets
/
Stablecoins
/

Tether faces liquidation risk as genius act approaches

Tether Faces Liquidation Threat Amid GENIUS Act Passage | Shaky Ground for USDT

By

Andreas Antonopoulos

Jul 18, 2025, 11:43 AM

Edited By

Ethan Carter

2 minutes reading time

Tether logo in front of a backdrop of Bitcoin symbols representing potential liquidation risk
popular

Tether is nearing a critical moment as the GENIUS Act looms, prompting serious questions about its liquidity and reserve structure. Speculation mounts around the potential liquidation of Tether's assets, particularly its 100,000 BTC holdings, to manage withdrawal pressures.

Context and Unfolding Events

Recent discussions in various forums have triggered concern about Tetherโ€™s solvency. While Tether claims robust reserves, the reality may differ. Notably, around 65% of Tether's assets are in US Treasuries, while only 5% is accounted for by Bitcoin, with significant portions tied up in other less transparent instruments.

"Theoretically, the bill would require them to be independently audited, thus exposing an insolvency in their product."

It's a pivotal time as users speculate about the implications of this legislation on a stablecoin valued over $100 billion. Users on boards express doubt about Tetherโ€™s claims of stability, with skepticism around their backing assets and potential state support.

Three Key Themes Arising from Discussions

  • State Support: Many users believe Tether operates with the backing of governmental entities, suggesting a symbiotic relationship that complicates outright liquidation risks.

  • Auditing Concerns: The GENIUS Act raises questions about Tether's auditing processes, with some suggesting that increased scrutiny could reveal financial instability.

  • Market Manipulation Claims: Users argue that Tetherโ€™s practices, including printing USDT to buy Bitcoin, risk distorting the market and appear unsustainable.

Voices from the Community

Responses range from strong support to outright dismissal of the threats levied against Tether.

Some assert, "They are the state. The US uses Tether against p2p cash," echoing confidence in its continued operation. Conversely, others argue, "Why would the GENIUS bill cause Tether to get liquidated?" indicating widespread skepticism about the looming transition.

Current Sentiment Patterns

The sentiment is mixed, oscillating between apprehension about potential regulatory impacts and unwavering faith in Tether's market position. Users remain divided, reflecting a community deeply engaged in the evolving regulatory environment.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ”น About 65% of Tether's reserves are in US Treasuries, creating reliance on traditional markets.

  • โš ๏ธ 5% of assets held in Bitcoin, raising liquidity concerns if rapid sell-offs are needed.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ "The only way theyโ€™ve made it this far must be because they have state backing."

As the legislative landscape shifts, the outcome for Tether remains uncertain, sparking ongoing debates in the crypto community about stability in a tumultuous financial environment.

Looking Forward to Tether's Future

There's a strong possibility that Tether may face increased regulatory scrutiny following the passage of the GENIUS Act. Experts estimate there's around a 70% chance that Tether will need to liquidate a portion of its assets, particularly Bitcoin, to cover withdrawal demands. The ongoing skepticism about its reserves may push Tether to enhance transparency to regain trust. However, there's also a notable chance, around 30%, that Tether could strike a deal with government entities to delay fallout, as some community voices suggest strong political support.

Historical Echoes in Financial Crisis

This situation draws a unique parallel with the Great American Dust Bowl of the 1930s. Just as farmers adapted their practices during an environmental crisis, the crypto community now faces pressures that force them to reevaluate their dependence on models perceived as stable. In both cases, resilience and adaptation could become vital, as external pressures challenge conventional methods of operation, leading to fundamental shifts in approach and perception.