A wave of concern regarding the staggering statistic that 80% of dollars in circulation were minted within the last five years continues to grow. The impact on inflation and the overall stability of the economy has become a pressing topic in forums and discussions.
Recent Changes in M1 Definition
Critics point out that a revision of the M1 monetary supply definition in 2020 compounds the confusion. One commenter remarked, "Specifically, it was changed to include checking accounts. That might be significant, eh?" Many believe this change obscured the true extent of money creation during the pandemic.
New Insights from Recent Comments
1. Push for Alternative Metrics
Some commenters advocate for focusing on M2 instead of M1 as a better indicator of economic reality. One noted, "Look at M2 instead," suggesting that it might provide a clearer picture of inflation and monetary supply.
2. Gold as a Safe Haven
A recurring theme is the suggestion to augment traditional currency strategies with gold investments. Another participant stated bluntly, "Buy gold then." This highlights a persistent search for stability in investors' strategies.
3. Radical Solutions Proposed
Some voices advocate extreme measures, like burning dollars to control the surplus. One commenter quipped, "We just need the gov to burn dollars." This reflects a desire for decisive action amidst economic uncertainty.
"This graph shows the actual increase in money supply, and it’s F#K!&g over 40% of all money was created since 2020."
— Noted investor sharing alarming statistics.
Insights from the Community
👀 80% of all dollars created in the past five years.
🔍 Misleading definitions continue to fuel debates.
💡 Increasing discussions around gold and M2 as alternatives for assessing economic health.
As economic transparency remains under the spotlight, the question lingers: Will policymakers address these issues head-on, or will concerns continue to simmer unresolved? For further details on M1 and M2 money supplies, consult reliable financial news sources.