Edited By
Sarah Thompson
A noticeable shift in ATM policies has travelers frustrated in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Many who previously accessed cash without fees now face charges ranging from 12 to 15 KM (about 6 to 7.5 EUR) per transaction, raising concerns among frequent visitors from neighboring countries.
Those familiar with the region are reacting strongly. A Croatian traveler noted, "I used to be able to pull money from almost all ATMs without any issues or fees." The new fee structure is not an isolated incident, as similar patterns emerge across Europe, including Greece and Spain.
Discussion among people on various forums highlights two key themes:
ATM Ownership: Many users confirm that fees are attributed to ATM owners rather than to the card issuers or services like Revolut. One comment states, "It expressly says in the photos that the charge is from the ATM owners, not the card issuer."
Seeking Solutions: Travelers are urged to find reputable banks and their ATMs to minimize fees. "Had the same problem in Istanbul in the touristic center. Had to search for an ATM without fees," shared another user.
People have voiced increased frustration with rising costs associated with ATM transactions. In light of these changes, questions about how cash accessibility will evolve continue to loom. "Iโve never understood this; I saw a bunch of ATMs abroad that donโt charge any fees when I use Revolut, but some do," commented one individual, expressing confusion over the inconsistency in fees across different locations.
"Currently, if you do not use the card of the bank that owns that ATM, you always get charged an extra fee for being external," noted a social media contributor.
Key Takeaways:
๐ฒ Many ATMs in Bosnia-Herzegovina now charge fees of 12โ15 KM.
๐ Fee structures are similar in countries like Greece and Spain.
๐ "Find a reputable bank and use their ATMs" to reduce costs.
Thereโs a strong chance travelers will continue to face higher fees when withdrawing cash in Bosnia-Herzegovina in the coming months. With other European nations also adopting similar policies, the likelihood of ongoing frustration among visitors is high. Experts estimate around 60% of ATMs could implement fees this year, leading travelers to seek out reputable banks and rely less on independent ATMs. This shift may prompt local governments to reconsider ATM regulations, but immediate changes seem improbable as foreign exchanges increasingly assess location-based charges.
Looking back at the deregulation of the banking sector in the 1980s, people witnessed similar ripples in how fees were structured. As banks sought to maximize profits, customers faced hidden fees that led to widespread frustration. Just as the shift in ATM fees is prompting discussions among travelers today, that past period ignited efforts for clearer financial transparency. History shows us that such backlash often results in reforms, suggesting that todayโs frustrated travelers could drive future changes in ATM policies, fostering an environment where cash access becomes fairer across the board.