Home
/
Regulatory updates
/
Tax implications
/

New york's potential crypto tax could bring in $158 million

New York Law Could Bring $158 Million in Crypto Tax Revenue | Excise Tax Proposal Creates Stir

By

Gina Roberts

Aug 16, 2025, 01:38 PM

Edited By

Jasmine Wong

3 minutes reading time

The New York skyline with a graphic of cryptocurrency coins and dollar signs
popular

A new proposal from New York Assemblymember Phil Steck seeks to impose a 0.2% excise tax on cryptocurrency transactions. If passed, this legislation could generate approximately $158 million annually to support substance abuse prevention programs in upstate schools. The tax directly addresses the opioid crisis while sparking heated discussions among various stakeholders.

The Proposal: What You Need to Know

Steck's Bill A0966 targets a broad range of digital assets, including NFTs and stablecoins, in a move to regulate the fast-growing crypto landscape in New York. The intention is clear: raise funds for urgent social issues, but mixed reactions highlight a potential backlash against these measures.

"This sets a dangerous precedent," states one frustrated commenter, signaling unease among some who fear excessive taxation will drive crypto businesses out of the state.

Public Sentiment is Divided

While some advocates see this tax as a necessary solution, critics voice their skepticism:

  • Financial Burden: A frequent sentiment among commenters points to an ongoing trendโ€”many people are concerned about the growing tax burden. One user grumbled, "Why would anyone live in NY with the way they want to confiscate their citizensโ€™ income?"

  • Concerns Over Migration: Commenters express fears that this may push traders to relocate. "NY lawmakers: โ€˜We found a new revenue stream.โ€™ Crypto traders in NY: packing bags for Florida," quipped another.

  • Deter Investment: Many critics believe the tax could discourage businesses from setting up in New York. "Traditional finance is already taking a hit due to crypto, and this will just deter companies," one observed.

Implications of the Proposal

The conversations surrounding the bill reflect a broader concern about balancing state revenue needs with the growth of a burgeoning industry. Sources confirm that although the tax aims to fund important social programs, it raises questions about regulatory overreach and the sustainability of the local crypto market.

Key Insights on the Debate

  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Financial Gain: Proposal could generate $158 million annually.

  • ๐ŸŒ Regulatory Push: The bill aims to regulate various digital assets, including NFTs.

  • โœˆ๏ธ Business Relocation: Fears of migration to states with less stringent tax policies.

Closing Thoughts

The proposed crypto tax in New York showcases both an effort to address pressing social needs and the potential for economic fallout. With people divided and vocal about the risks of overtaxing a growing industry, will lawmakers find a sweet spot that satisfies both the stateโ€™s financial needs and the community's concerns? Only time will tell.

Upcoming Trends in Cryptocurrency Taxation

As New York's proposed tax on cryptocurrency transactions faces scrutiny, thereโ€™s a strong chance that similar measures may ripple across other states. Observers predict that at least five states could take cues from New York, implementing their own crypto taxes within the next year. This is driven by growing interest in digital currencies and the need for state revenue, which has reached crisis levels in some regions. Experts estimate that if such taxation gains traction, it could lead to a migration of crypto entities to states with friendlier tax policies, ultimately reshaping the national landscape of the crypto market.

Unfolding Historical Echoes in Economic Policies

Interestingly, one can draw a parallel between this situation and the introduction of the income tax in the United States during the Civil War. Just as that tax aimed to fund a critical national effort, the proposed crypto tax seeks to support vital social programs. While the initial intent was clear, it led to years of contention and evolving tax policies that still resonate today. This historical insight serves as a reminder that economic measures, however well-meaning, can create unexpected challenges that shape future discussions around fiscal responsibility and industry growth.