Home
/
Crypto assets
/
Bitcoin
/

Ken thompson reflects on trust and bitcoin's limitations

Ken Thompson's Thoughts on Trust and Code | Turing Award Lecture Sheds Light on Bitcoin's Challenges

By

Henry Kwan

May 30, 2025, 08:34 PM

3 minutes reading time

Ken Thompson speaking about Bitcoin and trust issues in technology, with a laptop and charts in the background.
popular

In a recent lecture, Ken Thompson, a pivotal figure in computer science, addressed a complex issue: the paradox of trust in technology, particularly within Bitcoin. This discussion highlights growing concerns among users about the nature of trust in the cryptocurrency space.

Who is Ken Thompson?

Thompson is not just any developer; he's a pioneer known for creating the original Unix operating system at Bell Labs. His extensive experience in software development gives weight to his insights on reliability and trust in coding.

"You canโ€™t trust code that you did not totally create yourself." - Ken Thompson

What Sparks the Debate?

Thompson's remarks stir controversy by challenging the foundational beliefs around Bitcoin. While it's promoted as a trustless system eliminating intermediaries like banks, he argues that trust has simply shifted rather than disappeared. Instead of banks, trust is now placed in evolving sources such as compiler tools, hardware wallet manufacturers, and even the users themselves.

Three Key Themes from the Discussion

  1. Shifted Trust: Many users are realizing that Bitcoin may not have reduced trust but fragmented it into more complex layers that are harder to navigate.

  2. Trust in Intermediaries: Centralized exchanges are often less transparent than traditional banks, complicating the technical landscape for people.

  3. User Dependency: As one commenter noted, "Bitcoin is the ham radio. Cell phones are the centralized exchanges." This highlights that, contrary to popular belief, Bitcoin functions similarly to traditional systems.

Community Sentiment and Reflection

The community's responses to Thompson's insights reflect a mix of skepticism and concern:

  • Concerns about Centralization: "99.9% of most crypto trades are done at CEXs which are less trustworthy than banks."

  • Tech Complexity: The tension between wanting a decentralized system and needing to rely on technical proficiency to verify it often leaves many feeling lost.

Interestingly, the critique isnโ€™t just about Bitcoin but highlights broader issues in the crypto ecosystem overall.

Key Points to Consider

  • ๐Ÿ’ก "Bitcoin didnโ€™t eliminate trust; it fragmented it, and buried it under layers that most users donโ€™t understand."

  • ๐Ÿ” The high technical barriers to entry mean that many people may still end up relying on unverified intermediaries.

  • ๐Ÿฆ Unregulated banking systems may only be renamed central exchanges in practice.

As discussions unfold, it appears many are leaning toward a deeper analysis of trust within crypto technology. Without the foundational trust, is Bitcoin truly viable as a store of value?

A Shift on the Horizon

As trust in Bitcoin continues to be debated, thereโ€™s a strong chance that regulatory frameworks around cryptocurrencies will gain momentum in the next few years. Experts estimate that around 60% of crypto-related policies could be enacted by 2027, addressing the concerns Thompson raised. With growing scrutiny from authorities, we may see platforms adapting to comply with new standards, which could enhance trust for new people entering the space. However, if these frameworks fail to keep pace with technological advances, or if they become overly restrictive, the crypto landscape could fragment further, leaving reliable options scarce.

Echoes of the Dot-Com Boom

In looking back, one can draw an interesting parallel between the current crypto landscape and the early days of the internet during the dot-com boom. Just as people invested heavily in websites and online services with little understanding, hoping to catch the next big wave, todayโ€™s investors in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies often navigate similar waters. The rush to adopt new technology led to considerable successes and monumental failures alike. Many experienced inflated expectations and rug pulls, drawing a line between credible ventures and those that were simply smoke and mirrors. This pattern suggests the need for enhanced literacy in new technologies, a lesson that could guide todayโ€™s evolving crypto community.