By
John Doe
Edited By
David Mรผller
A growing number of people are abandoning the Holesky testnet due to recent failures. The testnet, which struggled to pass the Pectra fork, has led some to advocate for switching to Hoodi instead. The call for updated instructions has intensified as users seek reliable platforms to run their nodes.
Many have voiced frustrations regarding Holesky's performance. Commenters highlighted,
"Holesky failed unexpectedly to pass the Pectra fork, resulting in a somewhat unusable testnet."
This has resulted in users scrambling for alternatives. The consensus suggests that Hoodi offers a more stable environment for those looking to participate in testnet activities.
Curiously, some users were unaware of Hoodi until recent discussions surfaced. One comment noted,
"Yes, I would like to set up a testnet node on Hoodi instead."
Guides and resources are now being shared across various platforms, making it easier for newcomers to switch.
The sentiment within the community leans towards disappointment with Holesky, contrasted by optimism for Hoodi. Key themes emerged from conversations:
Failure of Holesky: Issues outlined in the comments signal a lack of trust.
Benefits of Hoodi: Users are actively seeking guidance for better setups.
Demand for Instruction: The community is ever-hungry for reliable, updated setup docs.
๐ฝ "Holesky's failure has led many to Hoodi."
โจ Positive support for Hoodi in community discussions.
๐ Guides and resources shared in official channels for Hoodi.
As the Holesky testnet continues to face hurdles, the urgency for updated instructions remains prevalent. Will Hoodi become the go-to solution? Only time will tell.