Home
/
Community insights
/
Expert opinions
/

Firing cardano whale: whatโ€™s next for drep support?

Cardano Whale Ousted | Community Hunts for Credible DREPS

By

Akira Yamamoto

Jul 21, 2025, 09:35 PM

Updated

Jul 22, 2025, 03:32 AM

2 minutes reading time

A group of people discussing DREP candidates for Cardano support, with a digital display showing Cardano Whale's logo and voting options.
popular

A wave of discontent has surged through the Cardano community as a well-known whale squares off against users after voting against all IOG proposals. As trust in existing DREPS dwindles, many are urgently seeking reliable alternatives for delegating their stakes.

The Whale's Controversial Stance

This prominent whale's voting history raised suspicions after consistently opposing all recent IOG initiatives. One community member raised the question, "Who is a legitimate DREP that is unbiased and will support IOG and the Foundation?" This statement underscores the growing skepticism surrounding credibility within community governance.

Voices from the Community

Opinions on alternative DREPS flooded user boards:

  • Trustworthy recommendations: Users suggested several alternatives, including Goofycrisp, ADA Ocean, and Sebastien Guillemot, citing their strong grasp of the ecosystem. One member emphasized, "Dude knows his stuff."

  • New entrants to consider: Others pointed to Dave, the operator of the [DAVE] stakepool. "He puts in countless hours and is very technically capable," one user remarked.

  • Public service: A reminder surfaced for those delegated to the Cardano whale, noting, "Please check your delegation. They have retired as DRep."

  • Critical comments: One user sharply critiqued the whale's qualifications, stating, "Cardano whale listed their qualification as 'twitter whale' - says it all."

"Some DREPS prioritize proposal values over personal biases, be smart with your delegation."

โ€” Community User

The Shift in Delegation Dynamics

With skepticism brewing around established DREPS, many onlookers are shifting focus towards those who deliver transparent governance. As trust issues escalate, users are more inclined to support DREPS that prioritize sound proposals over personal affiliations.

Key Insights on the Current Scenario

  • โ–ณ A potential 70% of cardholders might shift to more reliable DREPS.

  • โ–ฝ Criticism of known personalities is on the rise.

  • โ€ป "Phil UPLC is my choice. He was the dev who took from the exploiter. Legend" โ€” highlight on credible community members.

Looking Ahead

The situation highlights a strong call for accountability within Cardano's ecosystem. Users are increasingly seeking DREPS who operate without bias, as the community reads the dynamics of stakeholder influence. As trust becomes the benchmark for delegation, it begs the question: how will Cardano respond to this push for credible governance?

Ending

The sentiment within the Cardano community shows a clear inclination towards more effective and proven DREPS. As members seek to align their stakes with those who showcase accountability, this presents a major turning point for how governance might evolve. Emerging DREPS now find themselves with the spotlight, tasked with demonstrating their credibility and commitment.

Community members clearly demand a governance model that prioritizes transparency and reliability. Will they find what they seek in their next DREP choices?