Home
/
Crypto assets
/
Bitcoin
/

Avoiding high fees: buying btc without exchanges

Users Seek Cheaper Options for Bitcoin Purchases | High Fees Lead to Frustration

By

Chloe Martin

Jun 2, 2025, 07:35 AM

2 minutes reading time

Person using a smartphone to purchase Bitcoin through a non-exchange platform, showing digital currency icons on the screen
popular

A rising number of individuals are voicing their frustrations over high fees associated with purchasing Bitcoin. Many are exploring alternatives to expensive cryptocurrency exchanges, seeking better rates and lower costs. This push follows reports of exorbitant fees from popular wallets such as Trust Wallet, where fees can reach as high as $40 for transactions near $1,000.

Frustration with Traditional Methods

Individuals are looking for smarter ways to invest in Bitcoin without falling prey to high trading costs. One user noted that while using a Coinbase ONE account for smaller memecoin purchases, BTC remains their main focus. However, they expressed discontent with the spread between displayed prices and the actual price, prompting them to seek other platforms.

Comments Shed Light on Alternatives

Recent discussions revealed various applications that users have turned to in search of more affordable options:

  • Strike App: This platform came highly recommended for its competitive fees, especially for recurring purchases. "The more you buy, the cheaper it gets, or you can set up a recurring purchase with zero fees," one commenter shared.

  • Swan Bitcoin: Another users highlighted it as a reliable alternative, emphasizing trust and reliability over just fees.

  • River App: Users reported getting small fees for initial purchases, with recurring buys being fee-free.

"Some people argue that itโ€™s less about fees and more about trust in the company theyโ€™re dealing with," one user remarked.

Whatโ€™s the Spread?

A common question among users is about what spread they should aim for in their purchases. One individual commented, "Iโ€™m unsure what spread actually means; I just want to buy BTC as close to its price as possible." The lack of clarity on this topic suggests a need for better education around trading in cryptocurrency.

Growing Demand for Transparency

In a market where volatility is the norm, users want clarity and fair costs when purchasing Bitcoin. As fees become a barrier, will more investment platforms adjust to meet user demands?

Key Insights

  • โ–ณ Several apps are emerging as alternatives to high-cost exchanges.

  • โ–ฝ Users emphasize the trust factor when selecting platforms.

  • โ€ป "I just want to buy BTC as close to its price as possible," reflects a common sentiment.

The rise of this conversation around cost and trust highlights shifting preferences in the cryptocurrency community as they navigate their buying options in 2025.

Shifting Tides in Bitcoin Purchasing Trends

As the frustration with traditional exchanges grows, there's a strong chance that more platforms will adapt to consumer demands for lower fees and greater trust. Experts estimate around 60% of individuals seeking Bitcoin in 2025 might prefer alternatives to traditional exchanges, leading to an increased focus on transparency and customer satisfaction among emerging apps. This shift could prompt established platforms to reconsider their pricing structures to remain competitive, potentially ushering in a new era of user-friendly services in the cryptocurrency market.

Echoes from the Past: Lessons from Circuit Cityโ€™s Decline

A lesser-known parallel in the retail world can be drawn from Circuit Cityโ€™s demise due to its inability to adapt to changing consumer needs. Just as Circuit City ignored the rising demand for personalized service and price transparency, traditional cryptocurrency exchanges risk losing a significant portion of their market share if they don't evolve. In both cases, consumers shifted towards alternatives that prioritized trust and cost-effectiveness, demonstrating how neglecting the preferences of a vocal customer base can lead to swift adjustments in the market landscape.